Cross-Chapter Box 7 | Bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in mitigation scenarios

Your search for BECCS found 35 results.

CCB7 Bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in mitigation scenarios

Bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage ( BECCS ) in mitigation scenarios

View

Chapter 7 : Risk management and decision making in relation to sustainable development

7.7 Key uncertainties and knowledge gaps

… land, water, ES and food policies the impacts of increasing use of land due to climate mitigation measures such as BECCS , carbon-centric afforestation/REDD+ and their impacts on human conflict, livelihoods and displacement understanding how different land tenure systems, both formal …

View in report

Chapter 7 : Risk management and decision making in relation to sustainable development7.5 Decision-making for climate change and land

7.5.6Maximising synergies and minimising trade-offs

… areas policies Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) land management Enhanced weathering of minerals No data Bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage ( BECCS ) Standards and certification for sustainability of biomass and land use {7.4.6} Demand management Dietary change Awareness campaigns/education, changing food choices through nudges, synergies …

View in report

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages

6.4.5Potential consequences of delayed action

… and reforestation (Section 6.4.2). Additionally, climate change affects the productivity of bioenergy crops, influencing the potential mitigation of bioenergy and BECCS (Section 6.4.4). For response options in the supply chain, demand-side management, and risk management, while the consequences of delayed action are …

View in report

CCB9 Climate and land pathways

… the Paris Agreement. This includes the use of bio-energy or CDR, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage ( BECCS ) and afforestation. Land-based mitigation options have implications for GHG fluxes, desertification, land degradation, food insecurity, ecosystem services and other …

View

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages6.4.4 Opportunities for implementing integrated response options

6.4.4.2Interlinkages and response options in future scenarios

… are 57 studies (43 IAM studies) that articulate the effect of response options on mitigation, with most including bioenergy and BECCS or a combination of reduced deforestation, reforestation, and afforestation; 37 studies (21 IAM studies) discuss the implications of response options …

View in report

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages6.4.4 Opportunities for implementing integrated response options

6.4.4.1Where can the response options be applied?

… or due to the occurrence of adverse effects. Despite strong co-benefits for climate change mitigation, the deployment of bioenergy and BECCS would have co-benefits on only 9% of the ice-free land area (Figure 6.6), given adverse effects of this response option …

View in report

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages6.4.3 Impacts of integrated response options on Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP) and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

6.4.3.2Impacts of integrated response options on the UNSDGs

… SDGs, primarily as they prioritise land health over food production and poverty eradication. Several response options such as bioenergy and BECCS and some risk-sharing instruments, such as crop insurance, trade-off over multiple SDG with potentially significant adverse consequences. Overall, across categories of …

View in report

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages6.4.3 Impacts of integrated response options on Nature’s Contributions to People (NCP) and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

6.4.3.1Impacts of integrated response options on NCP

… and water quality but may trade-off with food production (Table 6.70). Several response options, including increased food productivity, bioenergy and BECCS , and some risk-sharing instruments, like crop insurance, have significant negative consequences across multiple NCPs.

View in report

Chapter 6 : Interlinkages between desertification, land degradation, food security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and integrated response options6.4 Managing interactions and interlinkages

6.4.2Sensitivity of the integrated response options to climate change impacts

… change will affect the productivity of bioenergy crops (Cronin et al. 2018), influencing the mitigation potential of bioenergy and BECCS (Calvin et al. 2013; Kyle et al. 2014). There is uncertainty in the sign and magnitude of the …

View in report

1 2 3 4