Special Report: Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate
Ch 00

Integrative Cross-Chapter Box on Low-lying Islands and Coasts


  • Alexandre K. Magnan (France)
  • Matthias Garschagen (Germany)
  • Jean-Pierre Gattuso (France)
  • John Hay (Cook Is.)
  • Nathalie Hilmi (Monaco, France)
  • Elisabeth Holland (United States)
  • Federico Isla (Argentina)
  • Gary Kofinas (United States)
  • Iñigo Losada (Spain)
  • Jan Petzold (Germany)
  • Beate Ratter (Germany)
  • Edward A.G. Schuur (United States)
  • Tammy Tabe (Fiji)
  • Roderik Van De Wal (Netherlands)

Review Editor

  • Joy Pereira (Malaysia)

Chapter Scientist

  • Jan Petzold (Germany)
Figure CB9.1
View details
Figure CB9.2
View details

Executive Summary

Ocean and cryosphere changes already impact Low-Lying Islands and Coasts (LLIC), including Small Island Developing States (SIDS), with cascading and compounding risks. Disproportionately higher risks are expected in the course of the 21st century. Reinforcing the findings of the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, vulnerable human communities, especially those in coral reef environments and polar regions, may exceed adaptation limits well before the end of this century and even in a low greenhouse gas emission pathway (high confidence1). Depending on the effectiveness of 21st century mitigation and adaptation pathways under all emission scenarios, most of the low-lying regions around the world may face adaptation limits beyond 2100, due to the long-term commitment of sea level rise (medium confidence). LLIC host around 11% of the global population, generate about 14% of the global Gross Domestic Product and comprise many world cultural heritage sites. LLIC already experience climate-related ocean and cryosphere changes (high confidence), and they share both commonalities in their exposure and vulnerability to climate change (e.g., low elevation, human disturbances to terrestrial and marine ecosystems), and context-specificities (e.g., variable ecosystem climate sensitivities and risk perceptions by populations). Options to adapt to rising seas, e.g., range from hard engineering to ecosystem-based measures, and from securing current settings to relocating people, built assets and activities. Effective combinations of measures vary across geographies (cities and megacities, small islands, deltas and Arctic coasts), and reflect the scale of observed and projected impacts, ecosystems’ and societies’ adaptive capacity, and the existence of transformational governance (high confidence) {Sections 3.5.3, 4.4.2 to 4.4.5, 5.5.2, 6.8, 6.9, Cross-Chapter Box 2 in Chapter 1}.

[1] In this Report, the following summary terms are used to describe the available evidence: limited, medium, or robust; and for the degree of agreement: low, medium, or high. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., medium confidence. For a given evidence and agreement statement, different confidence levels can be assigned, but increasing levels of evidence and degrees of agreement are correlated with increasing confidence (see Section 1.9.2 and Figure 1.4 for more details).



LLIC are already experiencing the impacts of climate-related changes to the ocean and cryosphere, for both extreme events and slow onset changes (Sections 4.3.3, 5.3.1 to 5.3.6, 6.2, 6.8, 6.9), due to their low elevation, narrow ecological zonation, climate sensitive ecosystems and natural resources, as well as increasing anthropogenic pressures (Sections 1.5, 4.3.2). High levels of impacts to coastal morphology, ecosystems and dependent human communities are detectable today and disproportionately higher risks are expected in the course of the 21st century (medium evidence, high agreement) (Sections 4.3.4, 5.3.7), even under a low emission pathway compatible with a 1.5°C global warming (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018; IPCC, 2018). The magnitude of projected impacts (i.e., risks; Cross-Chapter Box 2 in Chapter 1) will depend on future greenhouse gas emissions and the associated climate changes, as well as on other drivers such as population movement into risk-prone areas and societal efforts to adapt.

LLIC include a wide diversity of systems (Figure CB9.1). Relevant regions occur on both islands and continents from the tropics to the poles, and support urban and rural societies from across the development spectrum (including SIDS and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)). LLIC host around 11% of the global population (Neumann et al., 2015), and generate about 14% of the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Kummu et al., 2016). This integrative Cross-Chapter Box focuses on the array of challenges created by the melting of the cryosphere and the changing ocean, described throughout the report, to address societal risks, adaptation and the future habitability of LLIC.

Figure CB9.1

Figure CB9.1 | The global distribution of low-lying islands and coasts (LLIC) particularly at risk from sea level rise This map considers the Low Elevation Coastal Zone (elevation data from National Geophysical Data Center, 1999; LECZ, defined by McGranahan et al., 2007), islands with a maximum elevation of 10 m above sea level (Weigelt et […]

Figure CB9.1 | The global distribution of low-lying islands and coasts (LLIC) particularly at risk from sea level rise This map considers the Low Elevation Coastal Zone (elevation data from National Geophysical Data Center, 1999; LECZ, defined by McGranahan et al., 2007), islands with a maximum elevation of 10 m above sea level (Weigelt et al., 2013), Small Island Developing States (SIDS; UN-OHRLLS, n.d.), coastal megacities (cities with more than 10 million inhabitants, within 100 km from coast, and maximum 50 m above sea level; Pelling and Blackburn, 2013; UN-DESA, 2018) and deltas (Tessler et al., 2015). Regional sea level changes refer to projections under Representative Concentration Pathway(RCP)8.5 (2081–2100) (see Figure 4.8).


Drivers of Impacts and Risks

Climate-related hazards—LLIC are subject to the same climate-related hazards as other islands and coasts (overview in Wong et al., 2014), for both extreme events, for example, marine heat waves, tropical and extratropical storms, associated storm surges, and heavy precipitation; and slow onset changes, for example, retreat of glaciers and ice sheets, sea ice and permafrost thaw, sea level rise, and ocean warming and acidification (Sections 1.4, 2.2, 3.2 to 3.4, 4.2, 5.2, 6.2 to 6.6, Box 6.1). Table CB9.1 summarises the SROCC updates of these hazards, which often combine to explain part of observed climate impacts and projected risks. For example, accelerating sea level rise will combine with storm surges, tides and waves to generate to extreme sea level events that affect flooding (Section, shoreline changes (Section and salinisation of soils, groundwater and surface waters (Section Sea level rise will also combine with ocean warming to accelerate permafrost thawing in the Arctic (Sections, Ocean acidification will combine with ocean warming and deoxygenation to impact benthic and pelagic organisms, associated ecosystems (e.g., coral reefs, oyster beds) and top predators, with subsequent impacts on species’ abundance and distribution, and the ecosystem services benefiting human societies (Sections, 5.2.2, 5.3.1 to 5.3.6, 5.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.5.2, 6.6.2, 6.7.2, 6.8.2). Importantly, LLIC are at risk for multi-metre sea level rise projected post-2100 under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP)8.5 and restricted to 1–2 m in 2300 under RCP2.6 (Section

Table CB9.1

Summary information on the critical climate-related drivers for low-lying islands and coasts, their trends due to climate change, and their main physical and ecosystem effects. Based on SROCC chapters and IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5). MSL is mean sea level, RCP is Representative Concentration Pathway, TC is tropical cyclone, ETC is extratropical cyclone, SLR is sea level rise, SST is sea surface temperature.

Climate-related driver Physical/chemical effects Observed trends Projections SROCC section
Global mean sea level (MSL) Submergence, flood damage, erosion; saltwater intrusion; rising water tables/impeded drainage; ecosystem loss (and change) Tide gauge records:

very likely increase of

1.5 (1.1–1.9) mm yr–1 (1902–2010) and a total sea level rise of 0.16 (0.12–0.21) m

Acceleration: with high confidence

(–0.002–0.019) mm yr–2 over (1902–2010)


Satellite altimetry:

Global MSL of 3.0 mm yr–1 (2.4–3.6) over (1993–2015)

Acceleration: with high confidence

0.084 (0.059–0.090) mm yr–2 over (1993–2015)

RCP2.6 (2046–2065): 0.24 (0.17–0.32) m

RCP2.6 (2081–2100): 0.39 (0.26–0.53) m

RCP2.6 (2100): 0.43 (0.29–0.59) m

Rate of sea level rise (SLR) 4 (2–6) mm yr–1 in 2100


RCP4.5 (2046–2065): 0.26 (0.19–0.34) m

RCP4.5 (2081–2100): 0.49 (0.34–0.64) m

RCP4.5. (2100): 0.55 (0.39–0.72) m

Rate of SLR 7 (4-9) mm yr–1 in 2100


RCP8.5 (2046–2065): 0.32 (0.23–0.40) m

RCP8.5 (2081–2100): 0.71 (0.51–0.92) m

RCP8.5 (2100): 0.84 (0.61–1.10) m

Rate of SLR 15 (10–20) mm yr–1 in 2100

Regional sea level Substantial regional variability at decadal at multi-decadal time scales due to changing winds, air-sea heat and freshwater fluxes and altered ocean circulation Increased regional relative sea level with respect to AR5 nearly everywhere for RCP8.5 because of the increased Antarctic contribution (Figure 4.8)

Extreme sea levels It is very likely that flood return period in low-lying areas has decreased over the past 20th century High confidence in more frequently or yearly extreme sea level events which are currently rare (e.g., return period of 100 years) as a consequence of sea level rise at many locations for RCP8.5 by the end of the century (Figure 4.10).

Even earlier and for RCP2.6 in locations where historical sea level variability (tides and storm surges) is small compared to projected sea level rise

Storms: tropical cyclones (TCs), extratropical cyclones (ETCs) Storm surges and storm waves, coastal flooding, erosion; saltwater intrusion; rising water tables/impeded drainage; wetland loss (and change); coastal infrastructure damage and flood defense failure TCs: Decreasing frequency of severe TCs in eastern Australia since the late 1800s; increase in frequency of moderately large US storm surge events since 1923; recent increase of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Arabian Sea and intense TCs that make landfall in East and Southeast Asia in recent decades; increase in annual global proportion of hurricanes reaching Category 4 or 5 intensity in recent decades


ETCs: likely poleward movement of circulation features but low confidence in intensity changes (AR5)

TCs: SLR will lead to higher storm surge levels for the TCs that do occur, assuming all other factors are unchanged (high confidence).

Medium confidence that the proportion of TCs that reach Category 4 or 5 levels will increase, that the average intensity of TCs will increase (by roughly 1–10%, assuming a 2oC global temperature rise), and that average tropical cyclone precipitation rates (for a given storm) will increase by at least 7% per degree Celsius (SST) warming. Low confidence in how global TC frequency will change, although most studies project some decrease in global TC frequency

ETCs: Low confidence in future changes in blocking and storm tracks in the northern hemisphere. The storm track projections for the southern hemisphere indicate an observed poleward contraction and a continued strengthening and southward contraction of storm tracks in the future (medium confidence)

Waves Coastal erosion, overtopping and coastal flooding Small increases in significant wave height globally and larger increases (5%) in extreme wave height, especially in the Southern Ocean (medium confidence). Global wave power has increased over the last six decades with marked spatial changes by oceans and long-term correlations with sea surface temperature (low confidence) High confidence for projected increase of the mean significant wave height across the Southern Ocean, tropical eastern Pacific and Baltic Sea and for projected decrease of significant wave height over the North Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Low confidence in projections of significant wave height over the eastern north Pacific and Southern Indian and Atlantic Oceans. Low confidence in projected extreme significant wave height everywhere, except for the Southern Ocean (increase) and North Atlantic (decrease) (high confidence). Limited knowledge on projected wave period and direction.

Sea surface temperature (SST)


Changes to stratification and circulation; reduced incidence of sea ice at higher latitudes; increased coral bleaching and mortality, poleward species migration; increased algal blooms The ocean has warmed unabated, continuing the clear multi-decadal ocean warming trends documented in AR5. The 0−700 m layer of the ocean has warmed at rate of 5.31 ZJ yr–1 from 2005 to 2017. The long-term trend for 0–700 m layer has warmed 4.35 ZJ yr–1 from 1970 to 2017 For RCP8.5, the 0–2000 m layers of the ocean are projected to warm by a further 2150 ZJ (very likely range 1710 to 2790 ZJ) between 2017 and 2100

For RCP2.6, the 0–2000 m layers are projected to warm by 900 ZJ (very likely range 650 to 1340 ZJ) by 2100


(*) ZJ is Zettajoule
Marine heat waves Have very likely doubled since 1980s Very likely increase in frequency, duration, spatial extent and intensity, even under future low levels of warming 6.4.1
Freshwater inputs Altered flood risk in coastal lowlands; altered water quality/salinity; altered fluvial sediment supply; altered circulation and nutrient supply Medium confidence in a net declining trend in annual volume of freshwater input Medium confidence for general increase in high latitude and wet tropics and decrease in other tropical regions AR5
Ocean acidity Increased CO2 fertilization; decreased seawater pH and carbonate ion concentration (or ‘ocean acidification’) Virtually certain that ocean surface water pH is declining by a very likely range 0.017 to 0.027 pH units per decade, since 1980, everywhere individual time-series observations exist High confidence that the ocean will experience pH drops of between 0.1 (RCP2.6) or 0.3 (RCP8.5) pH

units by 2100, with regional and local variability, exacerbated in polar regions
Sea ice and permafrost thaw



More storm surges, increasing ocean swells, coastal erosion Permafrost temperatures have continued to increase to record high levels (very high confidence) Between 2007 and 2016, permafrost temperatures here increased 0.39°C ± 0.15°C in cold continuous zone permafrost and 0.20°C ± 0.10°C in warmer discontinuous zone permafrost.


It is very likely that Arctic sea ice extent continues to decline in all months of the year; the strongest reductions in September (–12.8% ± 2.3% per decade; 1979–2018) are likely unprecedented in at least 1000 years. It is virtually certain that Arctic sea ice has thinned concurrent with a shift to younger ice: since 1979, the areal proportion of thick ice at least 5 years old has declined by approximately 90%

For stabilised global warming of 1.5°C, an approximately 1% chance of a given September being sea ice free at the end of century is projected; for stabilised warming at a 2°C increase, this rises to 10–35% (high confidence). The potential for reduced (further 5–10%) but stabilised Arctic autumn and spring snow extent by mid-century for RCP2.6 contrasts with continued loss under RCP8.5 (a further 15–25% reduction to end of century) (high confidence).


Widespread disappearance of Arctic near-surface permafrost is projected to occur this century as a result of warming (high confidence). Near-surface permafrost area is projected to be reduced by 2–66% for RCP2.6 and 30–99% by 2100 under RCP8.5

Box 3.2





Anthropogenic drivers—Human factors play a major role in shaping exposure and vulnerability to climate-related changes in the Arctic, in temperate and tropical small islands, and in coastal urban areas (Sections 2.5.2, 4.3.2, Cross-Chapter Box 2 in Chapter 1). In the absence of major additional adaptation efforts compared to today (i.e., neither further significant action nor new types of actions), the anthropogenic drivers’ contribution to climate change related risk will substantially increase (high confidence) (Section

Highly context-specific territorial and societal dynamics have resulted in major changes at the coast, for instance the growing concentration of people and assets in risk prone coastal areas (Section, and the degradation of coastal ecosystem services such as coastal protection and healthy conditions for coastal fisheries and aquaculture (Section,, Local drivers of exposure and vulnerability include, for example, coastal squeeze, inadequate land use planning, changes in construction modes, sand mining and unsustainable resource extraction (e.g., in the Comoros; Betzold and Mohamed, 2016; Ratter et al., 2016), as well as loss of Indigenous Knowledge and Local Knowledge (IK and LK; Cross-Chapter Box 4 in Chapter 1). For example, the loss of IK and LK-based practices and associated cultural heritage limits both the ability to recognise and respond to ocean and cryosphere related risk and the empowerment of local communities (high confidence) (Section Population growth in medium-to-mega coastal cities is also of concern. For the year 2000, the Low Elevation Coastal Zones (LECZ, highest elevation up to 10 m above sea level) were estimated to host around 625 million people (Lichter et al., 2011; Neumann et al., 2015), with the vast majority (517 million) living in non-developed contexts. By 2100, the LECZ population may increase to as much as 1.14 billion under a Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) where countries focus on domestic, or even regional issues (SSP3; Jones and O’Neill, 2016). Poor planning can combine with coastal population growth and climate-related ocean change to create maladaptation (Juhola et al., 2016; Magnan et al., 2016).

Local factors drive—as well as are driven by—more regional processes such as extensive coastal urbanisation, human-induced sediment starvation (and implications on subsidence), degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems (e.g., mangroves, coral reefs and salt-marshes), lack of long-term integrated planning, changing consumption modes, conflicting resource use and socioeconomic inequalities (high confidence), among others. These are vehicles of increasing exposure and vulnerability at multiple scales.


Observed and Projected Impacts on Geographies and Major Sectors

Coastal cities and megacities—Coastal cities, especially megacities with over 10 million inhabitants, are at serious risk from climate-related ocean and cryosphere changes (Abadie, 2018). Over half of today’s global population lives in cities and megacities, many of which are located in LLIC, including New York City, Tokyo, Jakarta, Mumbai, Shanghai, Lagos and Cairo (Figure CB9.1). Without substantial adaptation interventions, and based on the compounding effects of future growth in population and assets, sea level rise and continued subsidence, future flood losses in the 136 largest coastal cities are projected to rise from 6 billion USD yr-1 at present to 1 trillion USD yr-1 in 2050 (Hallegatte et al., 2013; Sections and 6.3.3). In addition to important impacts on coastal megacities and large port cities, small and mid-sized cities are also considered highly vulnerable because of fast growth rates and low political, human and financial capacities for risk reduction compared to larger cities (Birkmann et al., 2016; Box 4.2).

At a more local scale, and regardless of the size of the city, coastal property values and development will be affected by sea level changes, storms and other weather and climate-related hazards. Real estate values, and the cost and availability of insurance, will be impacted by actual and perceived flood risks (McNamara and Keeler, 2013; Section; Putra et al., 2015). Properties are also at risk of losing value due to coastal landscape degradation (McNamara and Keeler, 2013; Fu et al., 2016) and increasing risk aversion. The economic consequences manifest in declining rental incomes, business activities and local employment (Rubin and Hilton, 1996).

Coastal megacities are especially critical nodes for transboundary risks (Atteridge and Remling, 2018; Miller et al., 2018) as they contribute substantially to national economies and serve as a hub for global trade and transportation networks. The 2011 floods in Bangkok, for example, not only resulted in direct losses of 46.5 billion USD (World Bank, 2012; Haraguchi and Lall, 2015), but also in important effects on supply chains across the globe (Abe and Ye, 2013). Urbanisation could, however, also provide opportunities for risk reduction, given that cities are centres of innovation, political attention and private sector investments (Garschagen and Romero-Lankao, 2015).

Small islandsThe extreme events occurring today, such as storms, tropical cyclones (TC), droughts, floods and marine heat waves (Herring et al., 2017), provide striking illustrations of the vulnerability of small island systems (high confidence) (Section 6.8.5, Box 4.2, Box 6.1). Societal dimensions can combine with climate changes, e.g., sea level rise, to amplify the impact of TCs, storm surge and ocean acidification in small islands contributing to loss and damage (Moser and Hart, 2015; Noy and Edmonds, 2016). For example, Category 5 TC Pam devastated Vanuatu in 2015 with 449.4 million USD in losses for an economy with a GDP of 758 million USD (Government of Vanuatu, 2015; Handmer and Iveson, 2017). Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu were all impacted by the TC Pam system (IFRC, 2018). In 2016, TC Winston caused 43 deaths in Fiji and losses of more than one third of the GDP (Government of Fiji, 2016; Cox et al., 2018). In 2017, Hurricanes Maria and Irma swept through 15 Caribbean countries, causing major damages and casualties across numerous islands. Rebuilding in three countries alone—Dominica, Barbuda and the British Virgin Islands—will cost an estimated 5 billion USD (UNDP, 2017). The Post-Disaster Needs Assessment for Dominica concluded that hurricane Maria resulted in total damages amounting to 226% of 2016 GDP (The Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica, 2017). In 2018, Category 4 TC Gita struck the Pacific islands of Eua and Tongatapu, impacting 80% of the population of Tonga through destruction of buildings, crops and infrastructure, and resulting in 165 million USD of losses with a national GDP of 461 million USD (Government of Tonga, 2018). Effective early warning systems, in some Caribbean islands, have reduced the impact (WMO, 2018). Projected changes in extreme weather include increased intensity of TCs with increased wind speed and rainfall, together with reduced translational speed creating greater destruction from individual storms and counteracting the decreased frequency of occurrence (Sections 6.3 and 6.8).

SIDS are home to 65 million people (UN-OHRLLS, 2015). More than 80% of small island residents live near the coast where flooding and coastal erosion already pose serious problems (Nurse et al., 2014) and since the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5) and the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR1.5), there is consensus on the increasing threats to island sustainability in terms of land, soils and freshwater availability. As a result, there is growing concern that some island nations as a whole may become uninhabitable due to rising sea levels and climate change, with implications for relocation, sovereignty and statehood (Burkett, 2011; Gerrard and Wannier, 2013; Yamamoto and Esteban, 2014; Donner, 2015). For example, at the island scale, recent studies (e.g., on Roi-Namur Island, Marshall Islands; Storlazzi et al., 2018) estimate some atoll islands to become uninhabitable before the middle of the 21st century due to the exacerbation of wave-driven flooding by sea level rise, compromising soil fertility and the integrity of freshwater lenses (Cheriton et al., 2016). The literature also discusses the future of atoll island shoreline. Atoll islands are not ‘static landforms’ (high confidence) and they experience both erosion (Section and accretion of land. In the Solomon Islands, where rates of sea level rise exceed the global average at 7–10 mm yr-1 (Becker et al., 2012), a study of 33 reef islands showed five vegetated islands had disappeared and six islands were concerned with severe shoreline erosion (Albert et al., 2016). In Micronesia, a study showed the disappearance of several reef islands, severe erosion in leeward reef edge islands and coastal expansion in mangrove areas (Nunn et al., 2017). In Tuvalu, with sea level rise of ~15 cm between 1971 and 2014, small islands decreased in land area while larger populated islands maintained or increased land area with the exception of the remote island of Nanumea (Kench et al., 2018). Positive shoreline and surface area changes over the recent decades to century have been observed for atoll islands in the Pacific and Indian oceans (McLean and Kench, 2015; Albert et al., 2016; Kench et al., 2018; Duvat, 2019). Out of 709 islands studied, 73.1% had stable surface area, 15.5% increased and 11.4% decreased in size over the last 40–70 years (Duvat, 2019). It has, however, been argued that the capacity of some atoll islands to maintain their land area by naturally adjusting to sea level rise could be reduced in the coming decades (low evidence, high agreement). Indeed, the projected combination of higher rates of sea level rise (Sections, and, increased wave energy (Albert et al., 2016; see also Section 6.3), changes in storm wave direction (Harley et al., 2017), as well as the impacts of ocean warming and acidification on the reef system (Quataert et al., 2015; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018), is expected to shift the balance towards more frequent flooding and increased erosion (Sections 4.3.3, 5.3.3).

Deltas—In a context of natural subsidence exacerbated by high human disturbances to sediment supply, for example, due to fresh water exploitation or damming and land use change upstream from the coast (Kondolf et al., 2014), marine flooding is already affecting deltas around the world (Brown et al., 2018; Section, Box 4.1). An estimated 260,000 km2 of delta area have been temporarily submerged over the 1990s–2000s (Syvitski et al., 2009; Wong et al., 2014). The recurrence of El Niño associated floods in the San Juan River delta, Colombia, led to the relocation of several villages, including El Choncho, San Juan de la Costa, Charambira and Togoroma (Correa and Gonzalez, 2000). The intrusion of saline or brackish water due to relative sea level rise in combination with storm surges and natural and human-induced subsidence, results in increasing residual salinity, as already reported in the Delaware Estuary, USA (Ross et al., 2015), in the Ebro Delta, Spain (Genua-Olmedo et al., 2016) and in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam (Smajgl et al., 2015; Gugliotta et al., 2017). This affects livelihoods, for example., freshwater fish habitat in Bangladesh (Dasgupta et al., 2017; Section Increased salinity limits drinking water supply (Wilbers et al., 2014), with associated repercussions for the abundance and toxicity of cholera vibrio (Vibrio cholerae) as shown in the Ganges Delta (Batabyal et al., 2014). Local agriculture is also at risk. Oilseed, sugarcane and jute cultivation have already ceased due to high salinity levels in coastal Bangladesh (Khanom, 2016) and dry-season crops are projected to decline over the next 15 to 45 years, especially in the Southwest (Kabir et al., 2018). In the Ebro delta, Spain, Genua-Olmedo et al. (2016) anticipate a decrease of the rice production index from 61.2% in 2010 to 33.8% by 2100 for a 1.8 m sea level rise scenario, far above the upper end of the RCP8.5 likely2 range (Section, Table 4.3).

Arctic coasts—Climate-related ocean and cryosphere changes combine to negatively impact not only the economy and life-styles of the Arctic coastal communities, but also the local cultural identity, self-sufficiency, IK and LK and related skills (Lacher, 2015; Sections 3.4.3, Changes in fish and seabird populations amplified by climate change have an impact on ecosystems and livelihoods in Arctic island communities such as in Norway’s Lofoten archipelago (Dannevig and Hovelsrud, 2016; Kaltenborn et al., 2017). Another concern relates to coastal erosion, for example triggered by permafrost thaw (Günther et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2018), and which already affects 178 Alaskan communities, with 26 in a very critical situation, such as Newtok, Shishmaref, Kivilina and northwestern coastal communities on the Chukchi Sea (Bronen and Chapin III, 2013). Noteworthy, erosion does not affect all Arctic coastlines: many of them are located in areas that experience rapid glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA) uplift (James et al., 2015; Forbes et al., 2018) and have low sensitivity to extreme sea levels and sea level rise. An additional factor unique to the Arctic coasts compared to other LLIC is the decrease in seasonal sea ice extent (Section 3.2.1,, that both reduces the physical protection of the land (Overeem et al., 2011; Fang et al., 2018), for example, from wave action, and allows for greater open water fetch producing stronger wind-generated waves in the open water (Lantuit et al., 2011). In combination with a decreased stability of permafrost—another specificity of polar regions (Romanovsky et al., 2010)—and sea level rise, seasonal sea ice extent reduction results in shoreline erosion (Gibbs and Richmond, 2017; Jones et al., 2018), with associated impacts on coastal settlements (Table 3.4). However, as mentioned above, local geomorphology and geology in the Arctic is as important as permafrost and sea ice extent for determining current and future erosion (Lantuit et al., 2011).

Risks to Arctic coasts will be reinforced by anthropogenic drivers originating in the recent decades of history (e.g., socioeconomic adjustments after government policies requiring children to attend school) which resulted in the construction of infrastructure in near-shore areas. While risk levels vary by village, in several cases infrastructure has been lost and subsistence use areas modified (Gorokhovich et al., 2013; Marino, 2015). More broadly, in the Arctic, ‘indigenous peoples (…) have been pushed into marginalised territories that are more sensitive to climate impacts’ (Ford et al., 2016: 350), with consequences in terms of undermining aspects of socio-cultural resilience.

Impacts on critical sectors and livelihoods—Economic impacts for LLIC are expected to be significant in the course of the century due to the convergence of the anticipated increase in the number of LECZ inhabitants (Jones and O’Neill, 2016; Merkens et al., 2016), the high dependency of societies on ocean and marine ecosystems and services (Section 5.4.1, 5.4.2), and increased detrimental effects of climate-related ocean and cryosphere changes on natural and human systems (medium evidence, high agreement) (Hsiang et al., 2017; United Nations, 2017). However, the degree of impacts on the economy and related dimensions—for example, on employment, livelihood, poverty, health (Kim et al., 2014; Weatherdon et al., 2016), well-being and food security (Sections 1.1 and 5.4.2, FAQ 1.2 in Chapter 1) and public budgets and investments—will vary across context-specific physical settings and exposure and vulnerability levels.

Considering a sea level rise scenario range of 25–123 cm—all RCPs; wider range of sea level rise scenarios than the likely range of AR5 but relatively consistent with the range of projections assessed in this report (Section—and no adaptation, Hinkel et al. (2014) estimated annual losses from future marine flooding to amount to 0.3–9.3% of global GDP in 2100. Noteworthy, coastal protection will inevitably have economic costs (DiSegni and Shechter, 2013), whether it involves hard coastal protection (Hinkel et al., 2018), ecosystem-based approaches (Narayan et al., 2016; Pontee et al., 2016) or a combination of both (Schoonees et al., 2019). Coastal agriculture (e.g., rice crops; Smajgl et al., 2015; Genua-Olmedo et al., 2016), and fisheries and aquaculture will also be seriously impacted (Sections,, 5.4.1). For example, it is expected that the marine fisheries revenues of 89% of the world’s fishing countries will be negatively affected by mid-century under RCP8.5 (Hilmi et al., 2015). The fact that more than 90% of the world’s rural poor are located in the LECZ of 15 developing countries (Barbier, 2015) and that these regions are highly dependent on fish for their dietary consumption, raises a serious concern about future food security (FAO et al., 2017; Section But not all regions are equally threatened, with Lam et al. (2016) estimating that the impacts on fisheries will be more important in SIDS, Africa and Southeast Asia. Cascading effects are also expected from risks to coral reefs and associated living resources, both on direct consumption by local communities and through disturbances to the broader food web chains (Sections 5.4.2, 6.5 and Box 6.1).

Coastal tourism could be affected in various ways by ocean- and cryosphere-related changes (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018; Sections, Coastal infrastructure and facilities, such as harbours and resorts (e.g., in Ghana; Sagoe-Addy and Appeaning Addo, 2013), are prone to storm waves. For coral reefs for recreational activities and tourism (especially diving and snorkelling), Chen et al. (2015) estimated that the global economic impact of the expected decline in reef coverage (between 6.6 and 27.6% under RCPs 2.6 and 8.5, respectively) will range from 1.9 to 12.0 billion USD yr-1. The future appeal of tourism destinations will partly depend on sea surface temperature, including induced effects such as an increase in invasive species, e.g., jellyfishes (Burge et al., 2014; Weatherdon et al., 2016) and lion fish in the Northwest Atlantic, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean (Albins, 2015; Johnston et al., 2015; Holdschlag and Ratter, 2016). It will also depend on how tourists and tourism developers perceive the risks induced by ocean-related changes (e.g., Shakeela et al., 2013; Davidson and Sahli, 2015). This will combine with the influence of changes in climatic conditions in tourists’ areas of origin (Bujosa and Rosselló, 2013; Amelung and Nicholls, 2014; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018) and of non-climatic components such as accommodation and travel prices. Importantly, estimating the effects on global-to-local tourism flows remains challenging (Rosselló-Nadal, 2014; Wong et al., 2014).

Recent studies provide further empirical evidence that people are rarely moving exclusively due to changes in ocean- and cryosphere-based conditions, and that migration as a result of disasters and increasing hazards strongly interact with other drivers, especially economic and political motivations (high confidence) (Kelman, 2015; Marino and Lazrus, 2015; Hamilton et al., 2016; Bettini, 2017; Stojanov et al., 2017; Perumal, 2018). While significantly higher risks of human displacement are expected in low-income LLIC, for example in Guatemala (Milan and Ruano, 2014) and Myanmar (Brakenridge et al., 2017), the issue also concerns developed countries. For example, Logan et al. (2016) show that people temporarily or permanently displaced by hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, USA, create a significant economic burden to tourism-dependent coastal cities and harbours.


Responses: Adaptation Strategies in Practice

A wide range of coastal adaptation measures are currently implemented in LLIC worldwide (Sections 1.6.2, 2.3.7, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 4.4.3, 5.5.2, 6.9, Figure 1.2, Box 5.4), including the installation of major infrastructure such as armouring of coasts (e.g., seawalls, groynes, revetments and rip-raps), soft engineering (e.g., beach nourishment and dune restoration), reclamation works to build new lands seaward and upwards, ecosystem-based measures (e.g., vegetation planting and coral farming), community-based approaches (e.g., social networks, education campaigns and economic diversification) and institutional innovations (e.g., marine protected areas and evacuation plans). The effectiveness of the measures to reduce risks depends on both local context-specificities (Gattuso et al., 2018) and the magnitude and timing of local climate impacts. However, there is still a gap in on-the-ground evidence, good practices and guidelines to evaluate the observed and projected benefits of each type of measures applied in various contexts, for example, to decide whether nature-based options represent low- to no-regret solutions, or not a solution at all.

Protection with hard coastal defences is commonly used to prevent inundation from extreme water levels and wave overtopping (Section In environments such as megacities, adequately engineered hard coastal defences are considered to be successful options and an efficient adaptation option in the long run (Hinkel et al., 2018). However, such measures can also lead to detrimental effects, such as erosion exacerbation by seawalls reflecting wave energy and jetties disrupting cross-shore sediment transport. Adaptation labelled measures ‘may [thus] lead to increased risk of adverse climate-related outcomes, increased vulnerability to climate change, or diminished welfare’ (Noble et al., 2014: 857) and therefore be maladaptive (Barnett and O’Neill, 2013; Juhola et al., 2016; Magnan et al., 2016). As a result, alternatives have emerged, such as ecosystem-based design measures including coconut fibre blankets (David et al., 2016), plantations of seagrass (Paul and Gillis, 2015), artificial reefs made from bio-rock materials (Beetham et al., 2017; Goreau and Prong, 2017) and bamboo breakwaters (David et al., 2016). While restoration operations are often rather associated to conservation practices, they can have co-benefits in terms of coastal protection services (Section For example, soft protection systems used in 69 studies were found to exhibit effectiveness in reducing wave heights at 70% for coral reefs, 62–79% for salt marshes, 36% for seagrass meadows and 31% for mangroves (Narayan et al., 2016). Arguing that coral reefs can provide comparably higher wave attenuation benefits to artificial defences such as breakwaters, Ferrario et al. (2014) conclude that reef defences for reducing coastal hazards can be enhanced cost effectively on the order of 1/10th. Coral reefs are, however, at very high risk from climate change (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018; Section 5.3.4), which challenges the duration of such benefits. Ecosystem-based measures, if applied place specific and adequate—for example, use of indigenous rather than exotic species (e.g., Duvat et al., 2016)—, are usually considered low-regret in that they can stabilise the coastal vegetation and protect against coastal hazards, while at the same time enhancing the adaptive capacity of natural ecosystems (medium evidence, high agreement) (Schoonees et al., 2019; Sections, 5.5.2, 6.9).

While human migration and relocation are expected to be a growing challenge for LLIC (medium evidence, high agreement) (Adger et al., 2014; Birk and Rasmussen, 2014; Milan and Ruano, 2014; Thomas, 2015; Sections,, 6.3.4, Table 3.4; Hajra et al., 2017; Stojanov et al., 2017), recent studies advocate for considering these options as adaptation to climate-related changes in the ocean and cryosphere (Shayegh et al., 2016; Allgood and McNamara, 2017; Hauer, 2017; Morrison, 2017; Perumal, 2018; Section Such a view is, however, convoyed by discussions on related costs and impacts on the wellbeing of the people who are relocated (Null and Herzer Risi, 2016). Coastal retreat is underway in various LLIC around the world, for example, in Alaska and the US (Bronen, 2015; Ford et al., 2015; Logan et al., 2016; Hino et al., 2017), Guatemala (Milan and Ruano, 2014), Western Colombia (Correa and Gonzalez, 2000), the Caribbean (Apgar et al., 2015; Rivera-Collazo et al., 2015) and Vietnam (Collins et al., 2017). Noteworthy, environmentally-induced relocation is not necessarily new, for example, in the Pacific (Nunn, 2014; Boege, 2016). The Gilbertese people from Kiribati moved to the Solomon Islands during the 1950s–1960s, as a result of long periodic droughts and subsequent environmental degradation (Birk and Rasmussen, 2014; Albert et al., 2016; Tabe, 2016; Weber, 2016). In the Solomon Islands, the relocation of the Taro Township (Choiseul Province) as a result of rising sea level and coastal erosion is already underway (Haines and McGuire, 2014; Haines, 2016). In Fiji, the relocation of Vunidogoloa village as a result of sea level rise and coastal erosion was successfully carried out in 2014 (McNamara and Des Combes, 2015). In Alaska, some communities (e.g., Newtok) responded to changing environmental and livelihood conditions due to permafrost thaw with self-initiated relocation efforts. Subsequently, Alaska state funding has been allocated to assist them (Bronen, 2015; Hamilton et al., 2016). Conflict escalation is a serious concern in the resettlement areas, between newcomers and locals, or between different groups of newcomers, particularly under conditions of land scarcity, high population density and (perceived) inequality (Connell and Lutkehaus, 2017; Boege, 2018). The obstacles thus extend well beyond the cost of relocation itself because of the multi-dimensional impacts on people’s lives. Relocation also concerns economic activities, as illustrated with shellfish aquaculture relocation in the west coast of the US due to ocean acidification-driven crises (Cooley et al., 2016).

For all interventions, adaptation is fully recognised as being a societal challenge, and not merely a question of technological solutions (medium evidence, high agreement) (Jones and Clark, 2014; McCubbin et al., 2015; Gerkensmeier and Ratter, 2018). Enhancing adaptation implies various sociopolitical and economic framings, coping capacities and cross-scale social and economic impacts (Sections 4.4.3, 4.4.5, Cross-Chapter Box 3 in Chapter 1). As a result, community-based decision making, sustainable spatial planning and new institutional arrangements gain increasing attention (Sections 4.4.4). Such approaches can involve working with local informal and formal institutions (Barron et al., 2012), enhancing risk ownership by communities through participative approaches (McEwen et al., 2017), establishing collaborative community networks (Hernández-González et al., 2016), and better integrating LLIC communities’ IK and LK (see McMillen et al., 2014; Cross-Chapter Box 4 in Chapter 1). Small island communities, in particular, can strengthen their adaptive capacities by building on relatively high degrees of social capital, that is, dense social networks, collective action, reciprocity and relations of trust (Petzold and Ratter, 2015; Barnett and Waters, 2016; Petzold, 2016; Kelman, 2017; Section The aim of all these approaches is both to facilitate the effective implementation of adaptive action, and create widespread acceptance of adaptation policies by stakeholders and local populations.

Participatory scenario building processes, collaborative landscape planning and co-design of ecosystem-based management for LLIC resilience are underway along with promising approaches to actively engage all levels of society in the exploration of future adaptation scenarios. Experiences are reported for the German North Sea coast (Karrasch et al., 2017), Tenerife Island in the Atlantic Ocean (Hernández-González et al., 2016) and Pacific island communities (Burnside-Lawry et al., 2017). While adaptation labelled measures currently applied ‘on the ground’ are mainly reactive and short-term, long-term approaches are emerging (Noble et al., 2014; Wong et al., 2014), as illustrated by the development of ‘adaptation pathways’—that is, long-term adaptation strategies based upon decision cycles that, over time, explore and sequence a set of possible actions based on alternative external, uncertain developments (Haasnoot et al., 2013; Barnett et al., 2014; Wise et al., 2014; Werners et al., 2015; Hermans et al., 2017; Section Key expected benefits are an improved consideration of both the evolving nature of vulnerability (Denton et al., 2014; Dilling et al., 2015; Duvat et al., 2017; Fawcett et al., 2017) and climate change uncertainty (O’Brien et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2014; Noble et al., 2014), as well as better anticipation of the risks of maladaptation (Magnan et al., 2016). Practical applications of adaptation pathways in LLIC are occurring, for example, in the Netherlands (Haasnoot et al., 2013), Indonesia (Butler et al., 2014), New York City (Rosenzweig and Solecki, 2014) and Singapore (Buurman and Babovic, 2017).



LLIC are particularly at risk from climate-related changes to the ocean and the cryosphere, whether they are urban or rural, continental or island, at any latitude and regardless of level of development (high confidence). Over the course of the 21st century, they are expected to experience both increasing risks (high confidence) and limits to ecological and societal adaptation (de Coninck et al., 2018; Djalante et al., 2018; Section, Figure 6.2, Figure CB9.2; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018), which has the potential to significantly increase the level of loss and damage experienced by local coastal livelihoods (e.g., fishing, logistics or tourism) (Djalante et al., 2018). However, there are still important research gaps on residual risks and adaptation limits, given that these limits can be reached due to the intensity of the hazards and/or to the high vulnerability of a given system, and can be ecological, technological, economic, social, cultural, political or institutional. In addition, ocean and cryosphere changes have the potential to accumulate in compound events and cause cascades of impacts through economic, environmental and social processes (medium evidence, high agreement) (Sections 6.8.2 to 6.8.3, Box 6.1). This is the case when coastal flooding and riverine inundation occur together, for example, during the 2012 Superstorm Sandy in New York City, USA (Rosenzweig and Solecki, 2014); the 2014 cyclone Bejisa in Reunion Island, France (Duvat et al., 2016), and the 2017 Hurricane Harvey in Houston, USA (Emanuel, 2017). Cascade effects far beyond the extent of the original impacts bring the risk in LLIC of slowing down and reversing overall development achievements, particularly on poverty reduction (low evidence, medium agreement) (Hallegatte et al., 2016). Global time series analysis of risk and vulnerability trends show that many Pacific island states have fallen behind the global average in terms of progress made in the reduction of social vulnerability towards natural hazards over the past years (Feldmeyer et al., 2017). These findings may well be indicative of the situation for other LLIC (medium confidence) (Hay et al., 2019).

In addition, LLIC provide relevant illustrations of some of the IPCC Reasons for Concern (RFC) that describe potentially dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system (IPCC, 2014; IPCC, 2018). LLIC especially illustrate the risks to unique and threatened systems (RFC1), and risks associated with extreme weather and compound events (RFC2), and the uneven distribution of impacts (RFC3). Using this frame, O’Neill et al. (2017) estimate, for example, that the potential for coastal protection and ecosystem-based adaptation will reach significant limits by 2100 in the case of a 1 m rise in sea level, suggesting the need for research into the crossing of environmental and/or anthropogenic tipping points (Sections 6.2). The SROCC report confirms that high risk to various geographies (Arctic communities remote from regions of rapid positive glacial-isostatic adjustment, megacities, urban atoll islands and large tropical agricultural deltas) are to be expected before a 1 m rise in global mean sea level (Section More broadly, this report suggests, first, that the drivers and timing of the future habitability of LLIC will vary from one case to another (Manley et al., 2016; Hay et al., 2018). Second, future storylines of risks will also critically depend on the multi-decadal effectiveness of coastal nations’ and communities’ responses (medium evidence, high agreement). This will, in turn, partly depend on transformation of risk management regimes in order to harness these potentials and shift course towards climate-resilient development pathways (low evidence, high agreement) (Solecki et al., 2017).

Figure CB9.2

Figure CB9.2 | The storyline of risk for Low-Lying Islands and Coasts (LLIC). From left to right, this figure shows that ocean- and cryosphere-related changes (ocean acidification, ocean warming, sea level rise, etc.) will combine with anthropogenic drivers (population growth, settlement trends, socioeconomic inequalities, etc.) to explain impacts on various LLIC geographies (cities, islands, deltas, […]

Figure CB9.2 | The storyline of risk for Low-Lying Islands and Coasts (LLIC). From left to right, this figure shows that ocean- and cryosphere-related changes (ocean acidification, ocean warming, sea level rise, etc.) will combine with anthropogenic drivers (population growth, settlement trends, socioeconomic inequalities, etc.) to explain impacts on various LLIC geographies (cities, islands, deltas, Arctic coasts). Depending on the combinations of responses (black dots; stylised representation of potential responses) along a continuum going from hard engineering to ecosystem-based approaches, and from securing current settings to relocation (light blue triangles), risks will increase or decrease in the coming decades. Some responses (black dots) will enhance either adaptation or maladaptation. SIDS is Small Island Developing States.



Magnan, A.K., M. Garschagen, J.-P. Gattuso, J.E. Hay, N. Hilmi, E. Holland, F. Isla, G. Kofinas, I.J. Losada, J. Petzold, B. Ratter, T.Schuur, T. Tabe, and R. van de Wal, 2019: Cross-Chapter Box 9: Integrative Cross-Chapter Box on Low-Lying Islands and Coasts. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M. Weyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 657-674. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.009.


  1. In this Report, the following summary terms are used to describe the available evidence: limited, medium, or robust; and for the degree of agreement: low, medium, or high. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., medium confidence. For a given evidence and agreement statement, different confidence levels can be assigned, but increasing levels of evidence and degrees of agreement are correlated with increasing confidence (see Section 1.9.2 and Figure 1.4 for more details).
  2. In this Report, the following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: Virtually certain 99–100% probability, Very likely 90–100%, Likely 66–100%, About as likely as not 33–66%, Unlikely 0–33%, Very unlikely 0–10%, and Exceptionally unlikely 0–1%. Additional terms (Extremely likely: 95–100%, More likely than not >50–100%, and Extremely unlikely 0–5%) may also be used when appropriate. Assessed likelihood is typeset in italics, e.g., very likely (see Section 1.9.2 and Figure 1.4 for more details). This Report also uses the term ‘likely range’ to indicate that the assessed likelihood of an outcome lies within the 17–83% probability range.


  1. Abadie, L. M., 2018: Sea level damage risk with probabilistic weighting of IPCC scenarios: An application to major coastal cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 582-598, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.069.
  2. Abe, M. and L. Ye, 2013: Building Resilient Supply Chains against Natural Disasters: The Cases of Japan and Thailand. Global Business Review, 14 (4), 567-586, doi:10.1177/0972150913501606.
  3. Adger, W. N. et al., 2014: Human security. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 755-791,
  4. Albert, S. et al., 2016: Interactions between sea-level rise and wave exposure on reef island dynamics in the Solomon Islands. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (5), 054011.
  5. Albins, M. A., 2015: Invasive Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce abundance and species richness of native Bahamian coral-reef fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 522, 231-243, doi:10.3354/meps11159.
  6. Allgood, L. and K. E. McNamara, 2017: Climate-induced migration: Exploring local perspectives in Kiribati. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 38 (3), 370-385, doi:10.1111/sjtg.12202.
  7. Amelung, B. and S. Nicholls, 2014: Implications of climate change for tourism in Australia. Tourism Management, 41, 228-244, doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.002.
  8. Apgar, M. J., W. Allen, K. Moore and J. Ataria, 2015: Understanding adaptation and transformation through indigenous practice: the case of the Guna of Panama. Ecology and Society, 20 (1), doi:10.5751/es-07314-200145.
  9. Atteridge, A. and E. Remling, 2018: Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9 (1), 1-16, doi:10.1002/wcc.500.
  10. Barbier, E. B., 2015: Climate change impacts on rural poverty in low-elevation coastal zones. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 165, A1-A13, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.05.035.
  11. Barnett, J. et al., 2014: A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1103-1108, doi:10.1038/nclimate2383.
  12. Barnett, J. and S. O’Neill, 2013: Minimising the risk of maladaptation: a framework for analysis. In: Climate Adaptation Futures [Palutikof, J., S. Boulter, A. Ash, M. Stafford-Smith, M. Parry, M. Waschka and D. Guitart (eds.)]. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 87-94, ISBN 9780470674963.
  13. Barnett, J. and E. Waters, 2016: Rethinking the Vulnerability of Small Island States: Climate Change and Development in the Pacific Islands. In: The Palgrave Handbook of International Development [Grugel, J. and D. Hammett (eds.)]. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 731-748, ISBN 9781137427236.
  14. Barron, S. et al., 2012: A Climate Change Adaptation Planning Process for Low-Lying, Communities Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise. Sustainability, 4 (9), 2176-2208, doi:10.3390/su4092176.
  15. Batabyal, P. et al., 2014: Influence of hydrologic and anthropogenic factors on the abundance variability of enteropathogens in the Ganges estuary, a cholera endemic region. Science of the Total Environment, 472, 154-61, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.093.
  16. Becker, M. et al., 2012: Sea level variations at tropical Pacific islands since 1950. Global and Planetary Change, 80-81, 85-98, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.09.004.
  17. Beetham, E., P. S. Kench and S. Popinet, 2017: Future Reef Growth Can Mitigate Physical Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on Atoll Islands. Earth’s Future, 5 (10), 1002-1014, doi:10.1002/2017ef000589.
  18. Bettini, G., 2017: Where Next? Climate Change, Migration, and the (Bio)politics of Adaptation. Global Policy, 8 (S1), 33-39, doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12404.
  19. Betzold, C. and I. Mohamed, 2016: Seawalls as a response to coastal erosion and flooding: a case study from Grande Comore, Comoros (West Indian Ocean). Regional Environmental Change, 17 (4), 1077-1087, doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1044-x.
  20. Birk, T. and K. Rasmussen, 2014: Migration from atolls as climate change adaptation: Current practices, barriers and options in Solomon Islands. Natural Resources Forum, 38 (1), 1-13, doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12038.
  21. Birkmann, J. et al., 2016: Boost resilience of small and mid-sized cities. Nature, 537 (7622), 605-8, doi:10.1038/537605a.
  22. Boege, V., 2016: Climate Change and Planned Relocation in Oceania. S&F Sicherheit und Frieden, 34 (1), 60-65, doi:10.5771/0175-274X-2016-1-60.
  23. Boege, V. 2018: Climate change and conflict in Oceania – Challenges, responses and suggestions for a policy-relevant research agenda (Toda Peace Institute Policy Brief 17). Toda Peace Institute, Tokyo [Available at: http://toda.org/files/policy_briefs/T-PB-17_Volker%20Boege_Climate%20Change%20and%20Conflict%20in%20Oceania.pdf, accessed 18/10/2018]
  24. Brakenridge, G. R. et al., 2017: Design with nature: Causation and avoidance of catastrophic flooding, Myanmar. Earth-Science Reviews, 165, 81-109, doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.12.009.
  25. Bronen, R., 2015: Climate-induced community relocations: using integrated social-ecological assessments to foster adaptation and resilience. Ecology and Society, 20 (3), doi:10.5751/ES-07801-200336.
  26. Bronen, R. and F. S. Chapin III, 2013: Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (23), 9320-5, doi:10.1073/pnas.1210508110.
  27. Brown, S. et al., 2014: Shifting perspectives on coastal impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 752–755, doi:10.1038/nclimate2344.
  28. Brown, S. et al., 2018: What are the implications of sea-level rise for a 1.5, 2 and 3 °C rise in global mean temperatures in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna and other vulnerable deltas? Regional Environmental Change, 18 (6), 1829-1842, doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1311-0.
  29. Bujosa, A. and J. Rosselló, 2013: Climate change and summer mass tourism: the case of Spanish domestic tourism. Climatic Change, 117 (1), 363-375, doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0554-x.
  30. Burge, C. A. et al., 2014: Climate change influences on marine infectious diseases: implications for management and society. Annual Review of Marine Science, 6, 249-77, doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135029.
  31. Burkett, M., 2011: The nation ex-situ: On climate change, deterritorialized nationhood and the postclimate era. Climate Law, 2, 345–374.
  32. Burnside-Lawry, J. et al., 2017: Communication, Collaboration and Advocacy: A Study of Participatory Action Research to Address Climate Change in the Pacific. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 9 (4), 11-33, doi:10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v09i04/11-33.
  33. Butler, J. R. A. et al., 2014: Framing the application of adaptation pathways for rural livelihoods and global change in eastern Indonesian islands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 368-382, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.004.
  34. Buurman, J. and V. Babovic, 2017: Adaptation Pathways and Real Options Analysis: An approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies. Policy and Society, 35 (2), 137-150, doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.05.002.
  35. Chen, P.-Y., C.-C. Chen, L. Chu and B. McCarl, 2015: Evaluating the economic damage of climate change on global coral reefs. Global Environmental Change, 30, 12-20, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.011.
  36. Cheriton, O. M., C. D. Storlazzi and K. J. Rosenberger, 2016: Observations of wave transformation over a fringing coral reef and the importance of low-frequency waves and offshore water levels to runup, overwash, and coastal flooding. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121 (5), 3121-3140, doi:10.1002/2015jc011231.
  37. Collins, N., S. Jones, T. H. Nguyen and P. Stanton, 2017: The contribution of human capital to a holistic response to climate change: learning from and for the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23 (2), 230-242, doi:10.1080/13602381.2017.1299449.
  38. Connell, J. and N. Lutkehaus, 2017: Environmental Refugees? A tale of two resettlement projects in coastal Papua New Guinea. Australian Geographer, 48 (1), 79-95, doi:10.1080/00049182.2016.1267603.
  39. Cooley, S. R., C. R. Ono, S. Melcer and J. Roberson, 2016: Community-Level Actions that Can Address Ocean Acidification. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2 (128), 1-12, doi:10.3389/fmars.2015.00128.
  40. Correa, I. D. and J. L. Gonzalez, 2000: Coastal erosion and village relocation: a Colombian case study. Ocean & Coastal Management, 43 (1), 51-64, doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(99)00066-6.
  41. Cox, J. et al., 2018: Disaster, Divine Judgment, and Original Sin: Christian Interpretations of Tropical Cyclone Winston and Climate Change in Fiji. The Contemporary Pacific, 30 (2), 380-410, doi:10.1353/cp.2018.0032.
  42. Dannevig, H. and G. K. Hovelsrud, 2016: Understanding the need for adaptation in a natural resource dependent community in Northern Norway: issue salience, knowledge and values. Climatic Change, 135 (2), 261-275, doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1557-1.
  43. Dasgupta, S., I. Sobhan and D. Wheeler, 2017: The impact of climate change and aquatic salinization on mangrove species in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Ambio, 46 (6), 680-694, doi:10.1007/s13280-017-0911-0.
  44. David, C. G., N. Schulz and T. Schlurmann, 2016: Assessing the Application Potential of Selected Ecosystem-Based, Low-Regret Coastal Protection Measures. In: Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice [Renaud, F., K. Sudmeier-Rieux, M. Estrella and U. Nehren (eds.)]. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 457-482, ISBN 9783319436319.
  45. Davidson, L. and M. Sahli, 2015: Foreign direct investment in tourism, poverty alleviation, and sustainable development: a review of the Gambian hotel sector. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23 (2), 167-187, doi:10.1080/09669582.2014.957210.
  46. de Coninck, H. et al., 2018: Strengthening and implementing the global response. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In Press
  47. Denton, F. et al., 2014: Climate-resilient pathways: adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1101-1131,
  48. Dilling, L. et al., 2015: The dynamics of vulnerability: why adapting to climate variability will not always prepare us for climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6 (4), 413-425, doi:10.1002/wcc.341.
  49. DiSegni, D. M. and M. Shechter, 2013: Socioeconomic Aspects: Human Migrations, Tourism and Fisheries. In: The Mediterranean Sea. Its history and present challenges [Goffredo, S. and Z. Dubinski (eds.)]. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 571-575, ISBN 9789400767034.
  50. Djalante, R. et al., 2018: Cross-Chapter Box 12: Residual risks, limits to adaptation and loss and damage. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In press
  51. Donner, S. D., 2015: The legacy of migration in response to climate stress: learning from the Gilbertese resettlement in the Solomon Islands. Natural Resources Forum, 39 (3-4), 191-201, doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12082.
  52. Duvat, V. et al., 2017: Trajectories of exposure and vulnerability of small islands to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8 (6), e478, doi:10.1002/wcc.478.
  53. Duvat, V. K. E., 2019: A global assessment of atoll island planform changes over the past decades. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10, e557, doi:10.1002/wcc.557.
  54. Duvat, V. K. E. et al., 2016: Assessing the impacts of and resilience to Tropical Cyclone Bejisa, Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). Natural Hazards, 83 (1), 601-640, doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2338-5.
  55. Emanuel, K., 2017: Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (48), 12681-12684, doi:10.1073/pnas.1716222114.
  56. Fang, Z., P. T. Freeman, C. B. Field and K. J. Mach, 2018: Reduced sea ice protection period increases storm exposure in Kivalina, Alaska. Arctic Science, 4 (4), 1-13, doi:10.1139/as-2017-0024.
  57. FAO et al., 2017: The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017. Building resilience for peace and food security. FAO, Rome, 117 pp. [Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-I7695e.pdf, accessed 17/04/2018]
  58. Fawcett, D., T. Pearce, J. D. Ford and L. Archer, 2017: Operationalizing longitudinal approaches to climate change vulnerability assessment. Global Environmental Change, 45, 79-88, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.002.
  59. Feldmeyer, D., J. Birkmann and T. Welle, 2017: Development of Human Vulnerability 2012–2017. Journal of Extreme Events, 04 (04), doi:10.1142/s2345737618500057.
  60. Ferrario, F. et al., 2014: The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nature Communications, 5, 3794, doi:10.1038/ncomms4794.
  61. Forbes, D. L. et al., 2018: Coastal environments and drivers. In: From Science to Policy in the Eastern Canadian Arctic: an Integrated Regional Impact Assessment (IRIS) of Climate Change and Modernization [Bell, T. and T. M. Brown (eds.)]. ArcticNet, Québec, 210-249,
  62. Ford, J. D. et al., 2016: Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports. Nature Climate Change, 6 (4), 349-353, doi:10.1038/Nclimate2954.
  63. Ford, J. D., G. McDowell and T. Pearce, 2015: The adaptation challenge in the Arctic. Nature Climate Change, 5 (12), 1046-1053.
  64. Fu, X., J. Song, B. Sun and Z.-R. Peng, 2016: “Living on the edge”: Estimating the economic cost of sea level rise on coastal real estate in the Tampa Bay region, Florida. Ocean & Coastal Management, 133, 11-17, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.009.
  65. Garschagen, M. and P. Romero-Lankao, 2015: Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability. Climatic Change, 133 (1), 37-52, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6.
  66. Gattuso, J.-P. et al., 2018: Ocean solutions to address climate change and its effects on marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Marine Sciences, 5, 1-18, doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00337.
  67. Genua-Olmedo, A., C. Alcaraz, N. Caiola and C. Ibáñez, 2016: Sea level rise impacts on rice production: The Ebro Delta as an example. Science of the Total Environment, 571, 1200-1210, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.136.
  68. Gerkensmeier, B. and B. M. W. Ratter, 2018: Governing coastal risks as a social process—Facilitating integrative risk management by enhanced multi-stakeholder collaboration. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 144-151, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.011.
  69. Gerrard, M. B. and G. E. Wannier, Eds., 2013: Threatened Island Nations: Legal Implications of Rising Seas and a Changing Climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,ISBN 9781107025769.
  70. Gibbs, A. E. and B. M. Richmond, 2017: National assessment of shoreline change—Summary statistics for updated vector shorelines and associated shoreline change data for the north coast of Alaska, U.S.-Canadian border to Icy Cape: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1107. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 21 pp. [Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2017/1107/ofr2017-1107.pdf, accessed 27/05/2019]
  71. Goreau, T. and P. Prong, 2017: Biorock Electric Reefs Grow Back Severely Eroded Beaches in Months. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 5 (4), 48.
  72. Gorokhovich, Y., A. Leiserowitz and D. Dugan, 2013: Integrating Coastal Vulnerability and Community-Based Subsistence Resource Mapping in Northwest Alaska. Journal of Coastal Research, 30 (1), 158-169, doi:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00001.1.
  73. Government of Fiji, 2016: Fiji. Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. Tropical Cyclone Winston, February 20, 2016. Government of Fiji, Suva, Fiji [Available at: https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/Post%20Disaster%20Needs%20Assessments%20CYCLONE%20WINSTON%20Fiji%202016%20(Online%20Version).pdf, accessed 17/04/2018]
  74. Government of Tonga, 2018: Post Disaster Rapid Assessment. Tropical Cyclone Gita. Government of Tonga, Nukuʻalofa [Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/tonga-pdna-tc-gita-2018.pdf, accessed 18/10/2018]
  75. Government of Vanuatu, 2015: Vanuatu. Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. Tropical Cyclone Pam, March 2015. Government of Vanuatu, Port Vila [Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/vanuatu_pdna_cyclone_pam_2015.pdf, accessed 18/04/2018]
  76. Gugliotta, M. et al., 2017: Process regime, salinity, morphological, and sedimentary trends along the fluvial to marine transition zone of the mixed-energy Mekong River delta, Vietnam. Continental Shelf Research, 147, 7-26, doi:10.1016/j.csr.2017.03.001.
  77. Günther, F. et al., 2013: Short- and long-term thermo-erosion of ice-rich permafrost coasts in the Laptev Sea region. Biogeosciences, 10 (6), 4297-4318, doi:10.5194/bg-10-4297-2013.
  78. Haasnoot, M., J. H. Kwakkel, W. E. Walker and J. ter Maat, 2013: Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23 (2), 485-498, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006.
  79. Haines, P., 2016: Choiseul Bay Township Adaptation and Relocation Program, Choiseul Province, Solomon Islands. Case Study for CoastAdapt. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast [Available at: https://coastadapt.com.au/sites/default/files/case_studies/CSS3_Relocation_in_the_Solomon_Islands.pdf, accessed 20/08/2018]
  80. Haines, P. and S. McGuire, 2014: Rising tides, razing capitals: A Solomon Islands approach to adaptation [online]. In: Practical Responses to Climate Change Conference 2014, Barton, Engineers Australia, 152-162.
  81. Hajra, R. et al., 2017: Unravelling the association between the impact of natural hazards and household poverty: evidence from the Indian Sundarban delta. Sustainability Science, 12 (3), 453-464, doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0420-2.
  82. Hallegatte, S. et al., 2016: Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. World Bank, Washington D.C. [Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22787/9781464806735.pdf?sequence=13&isAllowed=y, accessed 17/04/2018]
  83. Hallegatte, S., C. Green, R. J. Nicholls and J. Corfee-Morlot, 2013: Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change, 3 (9), 802-806, doi:10.1038/nclimate1979.
  84. Hamilton, L. C. et al., 2016: Climigration? Population and climate change in Arctic Alaska. Population and Environment, 38 (2), 115-133, doi:10.1007/s11111-016-0259-6.
  85. Handmer, J. and H. Iveson, 2017: Cyclone Pam in Vanuatu: Learning from the low death toll [online]. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 32 (2), 60-65.
  86. Haraguchi, M. and U. Lall, 2015: Flood risks and impacts: A case study of Thailand’s floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14 (3), 256-272, doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.005.
  87. Harley, M. D. et al., 2017: Extreme coastal erosion enhanced by anomalous extratropical storm wave direction. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 6033, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05792-1.
  88. Hauer, M. E., 2017: Migration induced by sea-level rise could reshape the US population landscape. Nature Climate Change, 7 (5), 321-325, doi:10.1038/nclimate3271.
  89. Hay, J., V. Duvat and A. K. Magnan, 2019: Trends in Vulnerability to Climate-related Hazards in the Pacific: Research, Understanding and Implications. In: The Oxford Handbook of Planning for Climate Change Hazards [Pfeffer, W. T., J. B. Smith and K. L. Ebi (eds.)]. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 136,
  90. Hay, J. E. et al., 2018: Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction: Research Synthesis Report. Submitted to the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Wellington, New Zealand [Available at: https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/Aid-Prog-docs/Research/Climate-Change-and-DRR-Synthesis-Report-Final-v6.4.pdf, accessed 17/04/2018]
  91. Hermans, L. M., M. Haasnoot, J. ter Maat and J. H. Kwakkel, 2017: Designing monitoring arrangements for collaborative learning about adaptation pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 69, 29-38, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.005.
  92. Hernández-González, Y. et al., 2016: Perspectives on contentions about climate change adaptation in the Canary Islands: A case study for Tenerife. European Union, Luxembourg [Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC104349/lbna28340enn.pdf, accessed 17/04/2018]
  93. Herring, S. C. et al., 2017: Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Climate Perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98 (12), S1–S157.
  94. Hilmi, N. et al., Eds., 2015: Bridging the Gap Between Ocean Acidification Impacts and Economic Valuation: Regional Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Fisheries and Aquaculture. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland,
  95. Hinkel, J. et al., 2018: The ability of societies to adapt to twenty-first-century sea-level rise. Nature Climate Change, 8 (7), 570-578, doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0176-z.
  96. Hinkel, J. et al., 2014: Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (9), 3292-3297, doi:10.1073/pnas.1222469111.
  97. Hino, M., C. B. Field and K. J. Mach, 2017: Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk. Nature Climate Change, 7, 364-370, doi:10.1038/nclimate3252.
  98. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al., 2018: Impacts of 1.5ºC global warming on natural and human systems. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In press
  99. Holdschlag, A. and B. M. W. Ratter, 2016: Sozial-ökologische Systemdynamik in der Panarchie. Adaptivität und Umweltwissen am Beispiel karibischer Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Geographische Zeitschrift, 104 (3), 183-211.
  100. Hsiang, S. et al., 2017: Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356 (6345), 1362-1369, doi:10.1126/science.aal4369.
  101. IFRC, 2018: Pacific Region: Tropical Cyclone Pam. Emergency Plan of Action Final Report. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies [Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/MDR55001efr.pdf, accessed 27/05/2019]
  102. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp pp.
  103. IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  104. James, T. S. et al., 2015: Tabulated Values of Relative Sea-Level Projections in Canada and the Adjacent Mainland United States. Geological Survey of Canada [Available at: http://ftp.maps.canada.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/publications/ess_sst/297/297048/of_7942.pdf, accessed 27/05/2019]
  105. Johnston, M. W., S. J. Purkis and R. E. Dodge, 2015: Measuring Bahamian lionfish impacts to marine ecological services using habitat equivalency analysis. Marine Biology, 162 (12), 2501-2512, doi:10.1007/s00227-015-2745-2.
  106. Jones, B. and B. C. O’Neill, 2016: Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (8), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084003.
  107. Jones, B. M. et al., 2018: A decade of remotely sensed observations highlight complex processes linked to coastal permafrost bluff erosion in the Arctic. Environmental Research Letters, 13 (11), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae471.
  108. Jones, N. and J. R. A. Clark, 2014: Social capital and the public acceptability of climate change adaptation policies: a case study in Romney Marsh, UK. Climatic Change, 123 (2), 133-145, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1049-0.
  109. Juhola, S., E. Glaas, B.-O. Linnér and T.-S. Neset, 2016: Redefining maladaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 135-140, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014.
  110. Kabir, M. J., D. S. Gaydon, R. Cramb and C. H. Roth, 2018: Bio-economic evaluation of cropping systems for saline coastal Bangladesh: I. Biophysical simulation in historical and future environments. Agricultural Systems, 162, 107-122, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.027.
  111. Kaltenborn, B. P. et al., 2017: Ecosystem Services and Cultural Values as Building Blocks for ‘The Good life’. A Case Study in the Community of Røst, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Ecological Economics, 140, 166-176, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.003.
  112. Karrasch, L., M. Maier, M. Kleyer and T. Klenke, 2017: Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios. Sustainability, 9 (9), 1-15, doi:10.3390/su9091668.
  113. Kelman, I., 2015: Difficult decisions: Migration from Small Island Developing States under climate change. Earth’s Future, 3 (4), 133-142, doi:10.1002/2014ef000278.
  114. Kelman, I., 2017: How can island communities deal with environmental hazards and hazard drivers, including climate change? Environmental Conservation, 44 (3), 244-253, doi:10.1017/S0376892917000042.
  115. Kench, P. S., M. R. Ford and S. D. Owen, 2018: Patterns of island change and persistence offer alternate adaptation pathways for atoll nations. Nature Communications, 9 (1), 1-7, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02954-1.
  116. Khanom, T., 2016: Effect of salinity on food security in the context of interior coast of Bangladesh. Ocean & Coastal Management, 130, 205-212, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.06.013.
  117. Kim, I. N. et al., 2014: Chemical oceanography. Increasing anthropogenic nitrogen in the North Pacific Ocean. Science, 346 (6213), 1102-6, doi:10.1126/science.1258396.
  118. Kondolf, G. M. et al., 2014: Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: Experiences from five continents. Earth’s Future, 2 (5), 256-280, doi:10.1002/2013ef000184.
  119. Kummu, M. et al., 2016: Over the hills and further away from coast: global geospatial patterns of human and environment over the 20th–21st centuries. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (3), 034010, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034010.
  120. Lacher, K., 2015: The island community of Chenega: Earthquake, tsunami, oil spill … What’s next? Global Environment, 8 (1), 38-60, doi:10.3197/ge.2015.080103.
  121. Lam, V. W., W. W. Cheung, G. Reygondeau and U. R. Sumaila, 2016: Projected change in global fisheries revenues under climate change. Scientific Reports, 6, 32607, doi:10.1038/srep32607.
  122. Lantuit, H. et al., 2011: The Arctic Coastal Dynamics Database: A New Classification Scheme and Statistics on Arctic Permafrost Coastlines. Estuaries and Coasts, 35 (2), 383-400, doi:10.1007/s12237-010-9362-6.
  123. Lichter, M., A. T. Vafeidis, R. J. Nicholls and G. Kaiser, 2011: Exploring Data-Related Uncertainties in Analyses of Land Area and Population in the “Low-Elevation Coastal Zone” (LECZ). Journal of Coastal Research, 27 (4), 757-768, doi:10.2112/jcoastres-d-10-00072.1.
  124. Logan, J. R., S. Issar and Z. Xu, 2016: Trapped in Place? Segmented Resilience to Hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, 1970–2005. Demography, 53 (5), 1511-1534, doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0496-4.
  125. Magnan, A. K. et al., 2016: Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7 (5), 646-665, doi:10.1002/wcc.409.
  126. Manley, M. et al., 2016: Research and Analysis on Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction. Working Paper 1: Needs, Priorities and Opportunities Related to Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Wellington, 128 pp. [Available at, accessed 18/04/2018]
  127. Marino, E., 2015: Fierce Climate, Sacred Ground: An Ethnography of Climate Change in Shishmaref, Alaska. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, 122 pp., ISBN 9781602232662.
  128. Marino, E. and H. Lazrus, 2015: Migration or Forced Displacement?: The Complex Choices of Climate Change and Disaster Migrants in Shishmaref, Alaska and Nanumea, Tuvalu. Human Organization, 74 (4), 341-350, doi:10.17730/0018-7259-74.4.341.
  129. McCubbin, S., B. Smit and T. Pearce, 2015: Where does climate fit? Vulnerability to climate change in the context of multiple stressors in Funafuti, Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change, 30, 43-55, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.007.
  130. McEwen, L. et al., 2017: Sustainable flood memories, lay knowledges and the development of community resilience to future flood risk. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42 (1), 14-28, doi:10.1111/tran.12149.
  131. McGranahan, G., D. Balk and B. Anderson, 2007: The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19 (1), 17-37, doi:10.1177/0956247807076960.
  132. McLean, R. and P. Kench, 2015: Destruction or persistence of coral atoll islands in the face of 20th and 21st century sea-level rise? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6 (5), 445-463, doi:10.1002/wcc.350.
  133. McMillen, H. L. et al., 2014: Small islands, valuable insights: systems of customary resource use and resilience to climate change in the Pacific. Ecology and Society, 19 (4), doi:10.5751/es-06937-190444.
  134. McNamara, D. E. and A. Keeler, 2013: A coupled physical and economic model of the response of coastal real estate to climate risk. Nature Climate Change, 3 (6), 559-562, doi:10.1038/nclimate1826.
  135. McNamara, K. E. and H. J. Des Combes, 2015: Planning for Community Relocations Due to Climate Change in Fiji. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6 (3), 315-319, doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0065-2.
  136. Merkens, J.-L., L. Reimann, J. Hinkel and A. T. Vafeidis, 2016: Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global and Planetary Change, 145, 57-66, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009.
  137. Milan, A. and S. Ruano, 2014: Rainfall variability, food insecurity and migration in Cabricán, Guatemala. Climate and Development, 6 (1), 61-68, doi:10.1080/17565529.2013.857589.
  138. Miller, M. A., M. Douglass and M. Garschagen, Eds., 2018: Crossing Borders. Governing Environmental Disasters in a Global Urban Age in Asia and the Pacific. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 288 pp., ISBN 9789811061257.
  139. Morrison, K., 2017: The Role of Traditional Knowledge to Frame Understanding of Migration as Adaptation to the ‘Slow Disaster’ of Sea Level Rise in the South Pacific. In: Identifying Emerging Issues in Disaster Risk Reduction, Migration, Climate Change and Sustainable Development [Sudmeier-Rieux, K., M. Fernández, I. Penna, M. Jaboyedoff and J. Gaillard (eds.)]. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 249-266,
  140. Moser, S. C. and J. A. F. Hart, 2015: The long arm of climate change: societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies. Climatic Change, 129 (1-2), 13-26, doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1328-z.
  141. Narayan, S. et al., 2016: The Effectiveness, Costs and Coastal Protection Benefits of Natural and Nature-Based Defences. PLoS One, 11 (5), e0154735, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154735.
  142. National Geophysical Data Center, 1999: Global Land One-kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) v.1. D. and P.K. Dunbar. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, Hastings, doi:10.7289/V52R3PMS.
  143. Neumann, B., A. T. Vafeidis, J. Zimmermann and R. J. Nicholls, 2015: Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding–a global assessment. PLoS One, 10 (3), e0118571, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118571.
  144. Noble, I. R. et al., 2014: Adaptation needs and options. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 833-868,
  145. Noy, I. and C. Edmonds. 2016: The economic and fiscal burdens of disasters in the Pacific (SEF Working Paper 25/2016). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington [Available at: http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/5439/Working%20Paper.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 26/05/2019]
  146. Null, S. and L. Herzer Risi, 2016: Navigating Complexity: Climate, Migration, and Conflict in a Changing World. USAID Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation Discussion Paper November 2016. United States Agency for International Development [Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/ecsp_navigating_complexity_web_1.pdf, accessed 21/09/2018]
  147. Nunn, P. D., 2014: Geohazards and myths: ancient memories of rapid coastal change in the Asia-Pacific region and their value to future adaptation. Geoscience Letters, 1 (1), doi:10.1186/2196-4092-1-3.
  148. Nunn, P. D., J. Runman, M. Falanruw and R. Kumar, 2017: Culturally grounded responses to coastal change on islands in the Federated States of Micronesia, northwest Pacific Ocean. Regional Environmental Change, 17 (4), 959-971, doi:10.1007/s10113-016-0950-2.
  149. Nurse, L. A. et al., 2014: Small islands. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change [Barros, V. R., C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1613-1654,
  150. O’Neill, B. C. et al., 2017: IPCC reasons for concern regarding climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 7 (1), 28-37, doi:10.1038/nclimate3179.
  151. O’Brien, K. et al., 2012: Toward a Sustainable and Resilient Future. In: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [Field, C. B., V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, D. J. Dokken, K. L. Ebi, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, G. K. Plattner, S. K. Allen, M. Tignor and P. M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 437-486,
  152. Overeem, I. et al., 2011: Sea ice loss enhances wave action at the Arctic coast. Geophysical Research Letters, 38 (17), 1-6, doi:10.1029/2011gl048681.
  153. Paul, M. and L. G. Gillis, 2015: Let it flow: how does an underlying current affect wave propagation over a natural seagrass meadow? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 523, 57-70, doi:10.3354/meps11162.
  154. Pelling, M. and S. Blackburn, 2013: Megacities and the Coast: Risk, Resilience, and Transformation. Earthscan, Abingdon, 248 pp., ISBN 9780415815048.
  155. Perumal, N., 2018: “The place where I live is where I belong”: community perspectives on climate change and climate-related migration in the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu. Island Studies Journal, 13 (1), 45-64, doi:10.24043/isj.50.
  156. Petzold, J., 2016: Limitations and opportunities of social capital for adaptation to climate change: A case study on the Isles of Scilly. The Geographical Journal, 182 (2), 123-134, doi:10.1111/geoj.12154.
  157. Petzold, J. and B. M. W. Ratter, 2015: Climate change adaptation under a social capital approach – An analytical framework for small islands. Ocean & Coastal Management, 112, 36-43, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.003.
  158. Pontee, N., S. Narayan, M. W. Beck and A. H. Hosking, 2016: Nature-based solutions: lessons from around the world. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Maritime Engineering, 169 (1), 29-36, doi:10.1680/jmaen.15.00027.
  159. Putra, H. C., H. Zhang and C. Andrews, 2015: Modeling Real Estate Market Responses to Climate Change in the Coastal Zone. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18 (2), 18, doi:10.18564/jasss.2577.
  160. Quataert, E. et al., 2015: The influence of coral reefs and climate change on wave-driven flooding of tropical coastlines. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (15), 6407-6415, doi:10.1002/2015GL064861.
  161. Ratter, B. M. W., J. Petzold and K. M. Sinane, 2016: Considering the locals: coastal construction and destruction in times of climate change on Anjouan, Comoros. Natural Resources Forum, 40 (3), 112-126, doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12102.
  162. Rivera-Collazo, I. et al., 2015: Human adaptation strategies to abrupt climate change in Puerto Rico ca. 3.5 ka. The Holocene, 25 (4), 627-640, doi:10.1177/0959683614565951.
  163. Romanovsky, V. E., S. L. Smith and H. H. Christiansen, 2010: Permafrost thermal state in the polar Northern Hemisphere during the international polar year 2007-2009: a synthesis. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 21 (2), 106-116, doi:10.1002/ppp.689.
  164. Rosenzweig, C. and W. Solecki, 2014: Hurricane Sandy and adaptation pathways in New York: Lessons from a first-responder city. Global Environmental Change, 28, 395-408, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.003.
  165. Ross, A. C. et al., 2015: Sea-level rise and other influences on decadal-scale salinity variability in a coastal plain estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 157, 79-92, doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.01.022.
  166. Rosselló-Nadal, J., 2014: How to evaluate the effects of climate change on tourism. Tourism Management, 42, 334-340, doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.006.
  167. Rubin, B. M. and M. D. Hilton, 1996: Identifying the Local Economic Development Impacts of Global Climate Change. Economic Development Quarterly, 10 (3), 262-279, doi:10.1177/089124249601000306.
  168. Sagoe-Addy, K. and K. Appeaning Addo, 2013: Effect of predicted sea level rise on tourism facilities along Ghana’s Accra coast. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 17 (1), 155-166, doi:10.1007/s11852-012-0227-y.
  169. Schoonees, T. et al., 2019: Hard Structures for Coastal Protection, Towards Greener Designs. Estuaries and Coasts, 1-12, doi:10.1007/s12237-019-00551-z.
  170. Shakeela, A., S. Becken and N. Johnston, 2013: Gaps and Disincentives that Exist in the Policies, Laws and Regulations which Act as Barriers to Investing in Climate Change Adaptation in the Tourism Sector of the Maldives. Final Project Report. UNDP, Maldives [Available at: http://www.tourism.gov.mv/downloads/tap/2014/FINALReport_REVISED_UNDPMaldives_161213.pdf, accessed 18/04/2018]
  171. Shayegh, S., J. Moreno-Cruz and K. Caldeira, 2016: Adapting to rates versus amounts of climate change: a case of adaptation to sea-level rise. Environmental Research Letters, 11 (10), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104007.
  172. Smajgl, A. et al., 2015: Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nature Climate Change, 5 (2), 167-174, doi:10.1038/nclimate2469.
  173. Solecki, W., M. Pelling and M. Garschagen, 2017: Transitions between risk management regimes in cities. Ecology and Society, 22 (2), doi:10.5751/ES-09102-220238.
  174. Stojanov, R. et al., 2017: Local perceptions of climate change impacts and migration patterns in Malé, Maldives. The Geographical Journal, 183 (4), 370-385, doi:10.1111/geoj.12177.
  175. Storlazzi, C. D. et al., 2018: Most atolls will be uninhabitable by the mid-21st century because of sea-level rise exacerbating wave-driven flooding. Science Advances, 4 (4), eaap9741, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9741.
  176. Strauss, B. H., S. Kulp and A. Levermann, 2015: Mapping Choices: Carbon, Climate, and Rising Seas, Our Global Legacy. Climate Central Research Report. Climate Central, Princeton [Available at: http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/uploads/research/Global-Mapping-Choices-Report.pdf, accessed 18/04/2018]
  177. Syvitski, J. P. M. et al., 2009: Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience, 2, 681, doi:10.1038/ngeo629.
  178. Tabe, T., 2016: Ngaira Kain Tari: We are people of the Sea. PhD Thesis. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  179. Tessler, Z. D. et al., 2015: Profiling risk and sustainability in coastal deltas of the world. Science, 349 (6248), 638-43, doi:10.1126/science.aab3574.
  180. The Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica, 2017: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment Hurricane Maria September 18, 2017. 161 pp. [Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/dominica-pdna-maria.pdf, accessed 21/09/2018]
  181. Thomas, A. R., 2015: Resettlement in the Wake of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines: A Strategy to Mitigate Risk or a Risky Strategy? The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C. [Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Brookings-Planned-Relocations-Case-StudyAlice-Thomas-Philippines-case-study-June-2015.pdf, accessed 18/10/2018]
  182. UN-DESA, 2018: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York [Available at: https://population.un.org/wup/Download/Files/WUP2018-F11a-30_Largest_Cities.xls, accessed 18/10/2018]
  183. UN-OHRLLS. n.d.: About the Small Island Developing States. [Available at: http://unohrlls.org/about-sids/, accessed 22/06/2018]
  184. UNDP, 2017: Regional Overview: Impact of Hurricanes Irma and Maria. UN Development Programme, New York [Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/UNDP%20%20Regional%20Overview%20Impact%20of%20Hurricanes%20Irma%20and%20Maria.pdf, accessed 17/04/2018]
  185. United Nations, Eds., 2017: The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment. World Ocean Assessment I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 973 pp., ISBN 9781316510018.
  186. Weatherdon, L. V. et al., 2016: Observed and Projected Impacts of Climate Change on Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture, Coastal Tourism, and Human Health: An Update. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 1-21, doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00048.
  187. Weber, E., 2016: Only a pawn in their games? environmental (?) migration in Kiribati – past, present and future. Die Erde, 147 (2), 153-164, doi:10.12854/erde-147-11.
  188. Weigelt, P., W. Jetz and H. Kreft, 2013: Bioclimatic and physical characterization of the world’s islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (38), 15307-12, doi:10.1073/pnas.1306309110.
  189. Werners, S. E. et al., 2015: Turning points in climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 20 (4), doi:10.5751/ES-07403-200403.
  190. Wilbers, G. J. et al., 2014: Spatial and temporal variability of surface water pollution in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 485-486, 653-665, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.049.
  191. Wise, R. M. et al., 2014: Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, 28, 325-336, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002.
  192. WMO, 2018: Caribbean 2017 Hurricane Season an evidence-based assessment of the Early Warning System. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva [Available at: https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=20700#.XJuRkK6nFaQ, accessed 01/05/2019]
  193. Wong, P. P. et al., 2014: Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 361-409,
  194. World Bank, 2012: Thai Flood 2011: Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and Reconstruction Planning. World Bank, Bangkok [Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26862, accessed 18/04/2018]
  195. Yamamoto, L. and M. Esteban, 2014: Atoll Island States and International Law. Climate Change Displacement and Sovereignty. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, 307 pp., ISBN 9783642381850.