Back to all figures

Figures: Chapter 1

For all usages of AR6 WGI figures, please refer to the IPCC Copyright Policy.

Figure 1.1

Figure 1.1 | Figure 1.1 | The structure of the AR6 WGI Report

Figure 1.2

Figure 1.2 | Main relations between AR5 WGI and AR6 WGI chapters.

Figure 1.3

Figure 1.3 | Visual guide to Chapter 1

Figure 1.4

Figure 1.4 | Changes are occurring throughout the climate system.

Figure 1.5

Figure 1.5 | Long-term context of anthropogenic climate changebased on selected paleoclimatic reconstructions over the past 800,000 years (800 kyr) for three key indicators: atmospheric CO2concentrations, global mean surface temperature (GMST), and global mean sea level (GMSL).

Figure 1.6

Figure 1.6 | Climate science milestones, between 1817 and 2021. Top: Milestones in observations.

Figure 1.7

Figure 1.7 | Schematic of temporal coverage of (a) selected instrumental climate observations and (b) selected paleoclimate archives.

Figure 1.8

Figure 1.8 | G.S. Callendar’s estimates of global land temperature variations and their possible causes.

Figure 1.9

Figure 1.9 | Assessing past projections of global temperature change.

Figure 1.10

Figure 1.10 | Range of projected temperature change for 1990–2030 for various regions defined in IPCC First Assessment Report (FAR).

Figure 1.11

Figure 1.11 | Choice of baseline matters when comparing observations and model simulations.

Figure 1.12

Figure 1.12 | Global warming over the instrumental period.

Figure 1.13

Figure 1.13 | Simulated changes in various climate indicators under historical and RCP4.5 scenarios using the MPI ESM Grand Ensemble.

Figure 1.14

Figure 1.14 | The observed emergence of changes in temperature.

Figure 1.15

Figure 1.15 | The ‘cascade of uncertainties’ in CMIP6 projections.

Figure 1.16

Figure 1.16 | Illustrating concepts of low-likelihood outcomes.

Figure 1.17

Figure 1.17 | Illustration of two types of tipping points

Cross-Working Group Box: Attribution, Figure 1

Cross-Working Group Box: Attribution, Figure 1 | Schematic of the steps to develop an attribution assessment, and the purposes of such assessments. Methods and systems used to test the attribution hypothesis or theory include: model-based fingerprinting; other model-based methods; evidence-based fingerprinting; process-based approaches; empirical or decomposition methods; and the use of multiple lines of evidence.

Figure 1.18

Figure 1.18 | Main region types used in this report.

Figure 1.19

Figure 1.19 | Resolution of the atmospheric and oceanic components of global climate models participating in CMIP5, CMIP6 and HighResMIP

Figure 1.20

Figure 1.20 | World map showing the increased diversity of modelling centres contributing to CMIP and CORDEX.

Figure 1.21

Figure 1.21

Figure 1.22

Figure 1.22

Figure 1.23

Figure 1.23

Figure 1.24

Figure 1.24

Figure 1.25

Figure 1.25

Figure 1.26

Figure 1.26

Figure 1.27

Figure 1.27

Figure 1.28

Figure 1.28

Figure 1.29

Figure 1.29

Box 1.1 Figure 1

Box 1.1, Figure 1 | The IPCC AR6 approach for characterizing understanding and uncertainty in assessment findings.

Cross-Chapter Box 1.2, Figure 1

Cross-Chapter Box 1.2, Figure 1 | Changes in radiative forcing from 1750–2019.

Cross-Chapter Box 1.4, Figure 1

Cross-Chapter Box 1.4, Figure 1 | The SSP scenarios used in this Report, their indicative temperature evolution and radiative forcing categorization, and the five socio-economic storylines upon which they are built.

Cross-Chapter Box 1.4, Figure 2

Cross-Chapter Box 1.4, Figure 2 | Comparison between the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP) scenarios and the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios

FAQ 1.1 Figure 1

FAQ 1.1, Figure 1 | Sample elements of climate understanding, observations and models as assessed in the IPCC First Assessment Report (1990) and Sixth Assessment Report (2021).

FAQ 1.2, Figure 1

FAQ 1.2, Figure 1 | Observed variations in regional temperatures since 1850

FAQ 1.3, Figure 1

FAQ 1.3, Figure 1 | Comparison of past, present and future.